UNIVERSITY
TO VILLAGE HALL
On 18th July 05,
Libri published a report entitled “From University to Village Hall” This
hard-hitting document can be found at:
http://www.libri.org.uk (pdf only)
The LLL comments on the report can be found in webpage:
Uni_to_V_Hall.htm
The MLA review of the report can be found at:
http://www.managinginformation.com/news/content_show_full.php?id=4109
![]() |
an
alliance of library user groups and supporters |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Fact
not Fiction 2008 - Facts and Figures about London’s public
libraries
The MLA, London has collected a wide range of statistics about London’s public libraries in a new document. It is well worth reading and is available for download from: http://www.mlalondon.org.uk/uploads/documents/Fact_not_Fiction_2008_v6.pdf AT July 08 |
CILIP Says Public Library Provision Will Get Worse
In a letter to the new Culture Secretary, James Purnell, the library professionals’ organisation, the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP), has accused Local Authorities of denying many communities the library service they're entitled to. In the letter, CILIP suggests that public library service provision has become a postcode lottery and is expected to get worse.
Although the letter is mainly concerned with the interests of library staff, the users’ needs are also coupled with these.
Unsurprisingly, Ian Snowley, CILIP President, has firmly
blamed local and national politicians rather than local government officers
for the deteriorating situation.
Press release:
http://www.cilip.org.uk/aboutcilip/newsandpressreleases/news070808.htm
AT , Aug 07
The Book Stock
in a public library is
usually considered by the users to be its most important asset. However,
many users groups find it impossible to establish the size of this asset.
A very simple method has now been proposed for estimating the number of books
on a library's shelves.
More information: countthosebooks(2).htm
LLL
Meetings:
7.30pm start at Camden Town Hall (Workshops may be held at other venues) |
![]() |
| 5th March 2009 | 2nd April 2009 | 7th May 2009 |
| 4th June 2009 | 2nd July 2009 | 6th August 2009 |
Brave
New World
No, not the Aldous Huxley book but a study of the possible affects of digitisation on the publishing industry. This “Brave New World” is a 120 page report containing an in-depth analysis of the changes that are beginning to be forced upon the book trade. The sober assessments of the study are in marked contrast to the hysterical reactions of the music industry when faced with the same problems and they deserve wide consideration. The report can be freely downloaded (see below).
More information: http://www.booksellers.org.uk/documents/digitisation_of_content/Brave%20New%20World.pdf
AT April 08
First Consultation on the Amendments to Copyright Exceptions Recommended by Gowers
On 8 January 2008 Lord Triesman, Minister for Intellectual Property, launched the first of a two part consultation on the recommendations made by the Dec. 2006 Gowers report on Intellectual Property.
Lord Triesman pointed out that it was necessary to ensure the IP protection systems are “robust enough - and sensible enough - not only to protect the rights holder from illegal activity, but to ensure that the consumer and user can make sensible use of protected works and also respect the rights attached to them.”
The consultation will
cover recommendations for changes to copyright law that will:
· enable schools and universities to make the most
of digital technologies and facilitate distance learning;
· allow libraries and archives to use technology
to preserve valuable material before it deteriorates or the format it is
stored on becomes obsolete;
· introduce a format shifting exception to allow
consumers to copy legitimately purchased content to another format, for example
CD to MP3, in a manner that does not damage the interests of copyright owners;
and provide a new exception for parody.
The responses to the consultation will be analysed and then a further consultation
on the resulting draft law will follow.
Further information:
http://www.dius.gov.uk/speeches/triesman_copyright_080108.html
http://www.ipo.gov.uk/policy/policy-issues/policy-issues-gowers/policy-issues-gowersreport.htm
AT Jan 08
The beginning of the public library movement was marked by the support of public-spirited individuals. Visionaries, such as Andrew Carnegie & John Passmore Edwards, were willing to use their energy and wealth for the betterment of less fortunate citizens. Now, in the UK, these nineteenth century philanthropists are only dimly remembered and are considered to have little relevance to present day circumstances.
However, under the influence of tightening local government finances, those circumstances have been changing for some time. For over twenty years there has been a slow drift away from a firm official belief in the importance of providing the poor with free access to a wide range of literature. That belief is now quite conditional - hemmed-in by many provisos. The nature of the link between education and the public libraries has been almost forgotten. The library safety net has been allowed to decay and many more people are now falling through it.
In contrast to the UK, the USA has never lost a strong voluntary aspect to the delivery of public library services. Thus, it is probably not very surprising to Americans that a financier, Stephen A. Schwarzman, should donate $100m to the New York Library Service. Indeed, one member of the NY Public Library’s board thought that he should have given more – an astounding reaction when viewed from this side of the Atlantic.
Are there no UK billionaires interested in improving the literacy of their fellow citizens? There is little doubt that they will soon be sorely needed.
Reference:
http://www.forbes.com/business/2008/03/11/billionaires-library-donation-biz-cx_af_0311schwarzman.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/mar/11/useconomy.usa
AT Mar 08
The
Literacy Disaster
The
Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (Pirls) is
undertaken every five years (2001 & 2006) in over 40 countries around
the world and measures the "reading literacy" & associated
factors for children aged approximately 10 years old. Thus, in most countries,
the Pirls investigation is aimed at children with four years of formal schooling.
However, in some countries, including England and Scotland, it takes place
after five years of schooling.
The score for England in 2006 was 539 and was 527 for Scotland. The highest 2006 score was 565 for the Russian Federation. The average score was 500 and the lowest score was 302 (South Africa).
The 2006 study found that children’s performance in England and Scotland had fallen in the previous five years. The reading performance of children in England had fallen from third to 19th in the world and Scotland also fell, from 14th to 26th. Top scoring Russia only managed to equal the Scottish score in 2001.
In England, the Department for Children, Schools and Families commissioned a separate report on the findings, from the independent National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER). This concluded that lower achievement among the better readers had contributed most to England's overall fall, rather than the small increase in the proportion of weaker readers. Perhaps the most worrying comment from the NFER is that there had been significant increases in the proportion of English 10-year-olds with the "least positive" attitudes to reading and who said they very seldom read stories or novels outside school.
The fact that both England and Scotland had a 2006 score somewhat above the average value of 500 has been suggested as a mitigating circumstance. However, if allowance is made for the extra year of schooling provided in these countries, this appears very much like grasping at straws. It is obvious that the rate of children's progress in most other countries is greater than England or Scotland.
Ed Balls, Children, Schools and Families Secretary, suggested that the same story was emerging from the government's consultation on its Children's Plan as from the Pirls study. He said "I'm calling today for everyone's help to get our children reading more and to kick-start a new national debate about the value of reading." As the public libraries have traditionally provided the UK’s educational safety net, Mr Balls would do well to ensure that Library Services are provided with sufficient funds to take up his challenge.
More information: http://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/pdfs/downloadable/PIRLSreport.pdf
Fifty eight Library Services in England have been given awards by the Big Lottery Fund to refurbish existing or build new public libraries. The size of the awards range from £250,000 to £2,000,000. Twelve of the winners were from London. They were:
![]() |
|
Full list of awards in England: http://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/pr_301007_eng_libraries_awards
AT Dec 07
Loughborough University’s
LISU research unit has published its Public Library Materials Fund and
Budget Survey for
2006-08
LISU found that total library expenditure for the UK fell by 0.3% in 2006/07, with a further fall predicted for 2007/08. Although the reported fall was small, LISU suggested that it was particularly disappointing as, at this time last year, libraries were predicting an increase of 3% in spending for 2006/07.
Expenditure on materials fell by 1.5% in 2006/07 and a further fall of 2.3% is expected for 2007/08. Within this overall fall, spending on books continues to decline slowly and, although spending on audio-visual materials (including electronic resources) rose slightly in 2006/07, it is predicted to fall again in 2007/08, by 1.4%.
Staff expenditure represents approximately 60% of overall public library expenditure, so small percentage changes in this figure has a far larger affect than other elements in a public library service’s budget. LISU reported that staff numbers have fallen for the first time for many years, and are predicted to fall further in 2007/08. The most expensive staff members are the professionally qualified ones and much of the decrease has been in this area.
Free download from: http://www.nielsenbookdata.co.uk/controller.php?page=91
AT Dec 07
Currently, there is no requirement for councils to respond to petitions, no matter how many people sign up. However, under these proposals, Councils would be legally required to respond to any petition gaining significant local support. If the response is unsatisfactory, the petitioners could ask their local councillor to trigger a 'select committee' style hearing within the local authority.
On the surface, the new proposals would strengthen local democracy. But, unless clear guidelines and sanctions are included in the resulting legislation, little will change. Local government bureaucracies have become used to circumventing such initiatives and there is no reason to suppose that ministerial rhetoric alone will change the situation.
More information: http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/localgovernment/petitionscalls
AT Jan.08
![]() |
Making Assets Work
On 19 September 2006, the then Communities Secretary Ruth Kelly announced a review of community management of public assets, chaired by Barry Quirk, Chief Executive of the London Borough of Lewisham. The Quirk Review reported to the Secretary of State at the end of March 2007 and the Review findings were published on 15 May, see www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1510515 for the report, “Making Assets Work”. The Government has now published its response to the Quirk Review. A practical action plan, "Opening the transfer window" sets out how Communities and Local Government will work with partner organisations to implement the review's recommendations in full. You can download a copy at www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1510746. |
July 07
Saving Your Library
This is the subject of many emails and telephone calls to
LLL.
Lewisham Council
tried to close 3 of its public libraries a little while ago. You can
read about the methods used to successfully fight against this at
localgroups/SaveYourLibrary.htm You can
still email and telephone us, if you wish.
![]() |
Library
Buildings & Library Books Don has generously offered to help any London public library friends' group with a building preservation problem. He can be contacted at Don.Bianco@english-heritage.org.uk Inevitably, the quality and quantity of the stock within libraries was criticized at the meeting. There are few library users meetings where this does not happen and, presumably, will continue to happen until library managements accept that the book stock takes precedence over all other things in a library's budget. Throughout the country, more and more space is appearing between library shelves as de-stocking occurs and one wonders just how far this can continue. Is it possible to have a completely empty library? A nightmare scenario perhaps in the UK but not elsewhere in the world. As a non-unique example take Colfe's School Library in the Gambia - no books at all. If librarians must weed their book stocks at an ever increasing frequency, would it not be better to give the rejects to such libraries rather than almost giving them away to the British public? |
AT Sep 07
HarperCollins, the publisher, has begun to make available selected books on its website. The free electronic editions are complete books, not extracts. Since November, HarperCollins has provided electronic extracts from about 15 of its current books and has obviously found that the initiative has paid-off in higher sales.
The HarperCollins move is a shrewd one. Although the entire contents of a book may be freely available via the internet, the rather clumsy nature of current computers, PDAs and e-book readers makes reading the complete electronic book an uncomfortable experience. Browsing the books, as in a bookshop, is another matter. The release of the Apple MacBook Air does not really alter the basic premise. Meanwhile:
What was predicted in the LLL technology webpage a long time ago is beginning to happen. The digitisation process is building momentum and will result in fundamental changes to the way public libraries operate.
More Information:
http://www.harpercollins.co.uk/news/default.aspx , http://www.polymervision.com/frameset.php?id=&page=
AT Feb.08
As London has been repeatedly penalised in this way over the past decade, services to residents have been under pressure for some time and this has resulted in library closure programs being proposed in Brent, Southwalk and Waltham Forest. The public library service is one of the few services in which central government allows local discretion to exist. Thus, it is easier to cut library services than almost any other locally provided service to the public.
It is the Local Authority, of course, which receives the criticism of library users, whilst central government is able to claim that it is in favour of public libraries. Perhaps it is in favour of public libraries outside London, it is certainly not within London, as its policies make it inevitable that they be cut back for the 7 million Londoners.
Oxford University’s Department of Social Policy & Social Work recently published “The English Indices of Deprivation 2007”. In this, London was ranked as the second most deprived region in England in absolute terms (after the North West) and the third most deprived region in % terms. London was also ranked bottom in a measure of the least deprived areas i.e. prosperity was spread more widely in all other regions. If these facts are combined with the knowledge that local taxation is not based on the ability to pay, the conclusion can be drawn that the poor of London are being forced to subsidize the rich in other regions.
More information: http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/doc.asp?doc=21594
http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/0809/grant.htm
www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/pdf/576659
AT Jan 08
2007
Comprehensive Performance Assessments
|
The 2007 Comprehensive
Performance Assessments (CPA) were published on 7th February. These provide
a measure of the quality of services provided by English councils to their
local communities and their commitment to improving these services in the
future.
Six of the 33 London boroughs are among the 13 authorities receiving the
highest possible rating under CPA. The figures also show that 97 per cent
of London’s boroughs are rated as improving well or strongly with 94
per cent gaining three or four stars (Harrow was the only borough to have
less than 3 stars). Seven of the 13 inner London authorities were awarded
4 stars but only three of the 20 outer London boroughs were judged to have
reached this standard.
The star rating gives a headline CPA result for a borough and thus provides
an average picture for the performance of each Council. However, within this
average, there are areas of high achievement and areas of low achievement.
In almost every London borough, the cultural area was found to have performed
below the average for the borough. The only exceptions to this rule are The
City of London, Westminster and Richmond upon Thames. The culture area is
where a borough’s public library service is usually grouped.
Click for a comparison of cultural performance
with overall performance for all London authorities.
More information:
http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/ , http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/cpa/
AT. Feb.08
Busy Libraries
The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) has published
its 2007 ranking of the UK’s 20 most busy public libraries. The Norfolk & Norwich
Millenium Library was the clear winner with 1,506,344 visits in the year
and 1,158,080 issues.
The leading London library was Croydon Central Library with a 4th place based
on visits (868,088) and 15th place based on issues (491,888). London public
libraries performed better on the visits measure than on the issues measure.
CIFA’s data could possible suggest an issues problem in London’s
public libraries and, more worrying, a general problem in inner London libraries
(no representative in either table). With the high levels of deprivation
in inner London and a great need to raise literacy levels, this would not
be good news. However, judging the effectiveness of a borough’s Public
Library Service on the performance of one “flagship” library
does not take into account the other libraries which are usually better integrated
into their local communities.
The inclusion of a borough library in the top 20 list could actually be a
good reason to look more carefully at the overall library provision in the
borough. One way to achieve a high ranking would be to reduce the service
elsewhere in the borough i.e. restrict opening hours or simply close libraries.
Such a policy would force people to travel to the “flagship” library
and would, of course, result in the poor being penalised.
NATIONAL
RANKING
|
BOROUGH
|
LIBRARY
|
VISITS
|
4
|
Croydon
|
Croydon
Central Library
|
1,033,410
|
9
|
Haringey
|
Wood
Green Central
|
783,687
|
11
|
Hounslow
|
Hounslow
|
753,038
|
15
|
Barnet
|
Hendon
|
724,334
|
NATIONAL
RANKING
|
BOROUGH
|
LIBRARY
|
ISSUES
|
15
|
Croydon
|
Croydon
Central Library
|
491,888
|
19
|
Bromley
|
Bromley
Central
|
471,145
|
AT Jan.08
WiFi Future in Libraries
On 22/09/06, the MLA and the WiFi specialist RegenerateIT published a report on WiFi in libraries. The report, “Review and Evaluation of WiFi in Public Libraries”, was compiled by Civic Regeneration (Civic) and Information Management Associates (IMA) and estimates that 23% of library services provide WiFi facilities for their users at present with 42% planning to offer the service in the next financial year. By 2009, half of all public libraries will have WiFi installations.
The benefits of using WiFi in libraries were expected to be an increased availability of public access PCs and a better use of limited floor space. In general, WiFi hotspots were viewed by library services as a natural extension of existing ICT provision. Other benefits found by services already delivering WiFi are:
• it increased the public profile of the libraries;
• it allowed the provision of additional services;
• it was received with enthusiasm by users and staff, with a good take-up
of the services.
Most (77%) of the existing WiFi hot spots are provided free of charge.
In addition to the near term increase in the number of libraries offering WiFi facilities, it is expected that there will be active marketing programs to ensure that these services provide maximum benefit to the communities served by them.
Review and Evaluation
of WiFi in Public Libraries is available at: http://www.mla.gov.uk/resources/assets//W/wifipubliclibraries_10230.pdf
The subject of Library Volunteers is becoming a popular topic of conversation among members of London’s Public Library Friends groups and the new issue of CIPFA Library Statistics has some data to add substance to those conversations (see below).
Just over half of London boroughs have public library volunteer schemes,but there appears to be enormous variability in how the boroughs use those volunteers. Some have very few volunteers and use each of them intensively. Others operate in exactly the opposite manner.
Inner London boroughs (42% have volunteer schemes) are less enthusiastic about volunteers than their Outer London counterparts (60% have volunteer schemes).
Some boroughs (3 of the total of 17 boroughs with volunteer schemes) are so off-hand about this form of help that they are unable to say how many hours of work are freely given by their volunteers per year. However, on average, London’s public library volunteers give only one hour per week to their library service (allowing for holidays). For the widespread, major improvements in service which advocates of volunteer programmes suggest is possible, there has to be a great increase in this commitment. Relying on a large number of people coming forward is unrealistic.
As with all published statistics, the CIFA figures are historic and tell us nothing about what has happened since the end March 2007. Because of this, the picture painted of the Hackney library service volunteer activities is quite average – an average number of volunteers occasionally helping out in the borough’s archives. This picture changed radically in March 2007, when Hackney reopened a library which had been closed since 1996. This small library is completely volunteer run and has proved to be a notable success. A LLL delegation visited Woodberry Down Community Library and has come away impressed. A report on the visit can be viewed at: VolunteerLibrary.htm
| Inner London Borough | No. of Volunteers |
No. of Volunteer Hours |
Hours per Volunteer |
for Year 2006 - 2007 |
for Year 2006 - 2007 |
||
| Greenwich | 9 |
2600 |
288.89 |
| Hackney | 28 |
1381 |
49.32 |
| Hammersmith & Fulham | 5 |
138.5 |
27.70 |
| Wandsworth | 56 |
2052 |
36.64 |
| Westminster | 75 |
4268 |
56.91 |
| Outer London Borough | |||
| Bexley | 116 |
5030 |
43.36 |
| Bromley | 48 |
1991 |
41.48 |
| Enfield | 31 |
1422 |
45.87 |
| Haringey | 6 |
||
| Harrow | 22 |
||
| Havering | 96 |
794 |
8.27 |
| Hillingdon | 13 |
1514.7 |
116.52 |
| Hounslow | 9 |
1692 |
188.00 |
| Merton | 25 |
1294.5 |
51.78 |
| Newham | 39 |
1170 |
30.00 |
| Redbridge | 16 |
||
| Richmond upon Thames | 69 |
3327 |
48.22 |
| Total for Average Hrs. Calc. | 619 |
28674.7 |
|
| Overall Total | 663 |
||
| Average Hours /Volunteer/Yr. | 46.32 |
AT Aug 08